Where do people get the idea that photo chemicals are hazardous materials
l often see responses on here indicating that there is something highly
dangerous or corrosive about photo chemicals which means that they should
not be handled in the house. Besides being a hobbyist
photographer who has his own darkroom, I am also currently working toward
a bachelor of science degree in Chemistry, and planning to pursue a career
as a chemist. As such, I am done a fair amount of research on the chemical processes that are going on, as well as just what exactly is in the chemicals. There are a few highly toxic developing agents, such as Pyro formulas, which few use anyway. Normal developers, such as D76, are actually quite safe to handle. In fact, hydroquinone, one of the developing agents in D76, is used in some medicines. D76 also contains borax, available as a cleaner, and sodium sulfite, used as a preservative. The only other thing is metol, which is non toxic,although it does cause an allergic reaction in some people. Where do people get all of these ideas Traditional “hypo” fixers contained sodium thiosulfate, which is a common additive to table salt. Yes, used fixer does contain dissolved silver. All heavy metals are dangerous with ingestion, but not just with normal skin contact. Silver can also cause problems with septic tanks and sewage systems, although with most home darkroom users (a few rolls a week, at most), Kodak says that it’s okay to dump fixer down the drain. l personally play it safe and remove the silver. Many people just toss some steel wool into a bucket with their spent fixer and let a silver sludge precipitate out, making a solution which is 100% safe to pour down the drain in any quantity. l personally use hydrochloric acid to precipitate out silver chloride, which l then filter out. The remaining solution can be poured down the drain, and the solid silver chloride can be landfilled. Stop bath contains a very dilute solution of acetic acid, which is commonly known as vinegar. The acetic acid concentration in a typical stop bath is even lower than that of distilled white vinegar, though. Fair points from both of you all. There are very few chemicals which are good for your eyes. It is for that reason that l make it a point to wear eye protection when handling most any chemicals, whether working in the lab, cleaning the bathroom, or working in the darkroom. For the darkroom and cleaning the bathroom, prescription glasses are generally sufficient protection, and the protection l employ, as they prevent anything potentially dangerous from splashing into your eyes. l suggest the same precaution to everyone, as your eyes are particularly delicate. When working in the lab, l always wear at a minimum polycarbonate safety glasses with side shields, or, depending on the circumstances, full protection visor-type goggles or even a full face shield. l suppose that the point l failed to explicitly make in all my rambling was the notion l often see regurgitated here that photo chemicals require some sort of special HAZMAT disposal. Anyway, thanks for the responses so far. Fhotoace, One of my favorite developers is the Sprint developer, which is sold concentrated and diluted 1:9 before use. For each 35mm roll, l use about .8 ounces of developer concentrate. For a few rolls a week, that amount is so incredibly insignificant compared to the rest of the water that goes down the drain at my house in the course of a week that it is not even worth considering. If l were to take 500+ gallons of fresh tap water(typical weekly home water usage in the US) and mix in 3 ounces of developer concentrate, the water would still be perfectly safe to drink, since the concentration would be so low it would not be an issue. Stop bath is nothing more than diluted vinegar. Again, completely safe and harmless to the environment. After silver recovery in the manner l have describe(treating with hydrochloric acid), fixer is nothing more than saltwater. Again, completely hazardous to the environment.
People probably get the wrong idea & think ''hazardous'' means
it will kill you as soon as you come in contact with it.
Hazardous simply means that it will harm you if you don't handle it
properly, e.g. if it will burn ur eyes & poison you if ingested.
To know if a photo, or household, chemical is hazardous to ur health, simply check the warning labels on the bottles (or, if you want to really get to the bottom of it, the MDS sheets). Just because a chemical is used in medicine & household product (or even in our ''food'') does not mean it is safe. We are sadly finding this out & pulling off cold medicine for infants as we speak. Be careful, just because you don't feel anything now does not mean it is not hurting you. Through prolonged exposure, some of these chemicals accumulate until they tip the balance & ur health declines. But follow the safe use of the photo chemicals & you can enjoy ur darkroom for many years.
I've been a photographer for 25 years and I will tell you that
having your hands in these chemicals for long periods of time IS
dangerous. Everyone ( including myself ) I know that worked with me is
sick. I needed a liver transplant. Don't be so complacent. These things
are concentrated beyond what is safe. I still develop my own at home, but
wear gloves adnd don't get the chemicals on my hands. Also, the government
says Fixer is a Hazardous Product and shipping it indicates that.
Read the MSDS sheets on the chemicals involved. C-41, E-6, or
B&W chemistry?
Your are right that the photographer is not in any danger .. it
is the environment that is of concern
The used chemicals are hazardous to the environment & for that reason must
be disposed of as such.
I have worked in photo labs for years & we have always had to dispose of our chemicals in approved ways. Hazardous waste disposal, etc. Today at the colleges darkroom, all used developer is put into hazardous waste containers & fixer is run through a silver recovery (heavy metal) unit before it too is put into an approved container.
I think you're asking the wrong people, my friend. Unless
these agents have been designated 'hazardous' by or fall under regulation
of the occupational safety & health administration (OSHA) that oversees
the regulation & handling of hazardous materials, ur point only goes to
assure people who don't know better, that these materials are in fact
safe. If they are not, & display so in labeling, than people will have to
trust that the regulating body that controls the handling of those chemicals have researched the effects of those chemicals to adequately deem them, hazardous. As a rule of thumb, I assume that anything that will not interact well with my eyes, should be handled with care & would warrant a warning. I don't develop film, so I don't know. But I have to assume that metol is not good for my eyes. I can tell you that businesses under control of OSHA are required to maintain an MSDS (material safety data sheets) on developer & other related chemicals. So there must be something in the combination of chemicals that could serve to detriment the safety of those who use them. Afterall, warnings come from experience in the safety of users of any chemical, that was compromised in some way, by that chemical. Better to be safe, than sorry.
In my laymans terms, I'd guess if you can ingest them or splash
them on ur face with eyes open & have little or no effect then they aren't
hazardous.
If on the otherhand you can be harmed by them even by doing stupid things
like pouring them into an open eye, they are by default hazardous &
although I am a firm believer in darwinism, they need to be marked as that. If anything so that chemical companies can avoid potential lawsuits & also to properly warn those of us who are a bit more cautious & actually read warning labels before we use something.
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Best tool to remove brad nails Best way to grind whole flax seeds What industrial equipment may affect pacemaker function? are builders allowed to use angle grinders and other tools before 9 am what is a good way to make a spear Am I getting a good deal I have a craftsman 33Gal, 150PSI Max, 2HP compresor, can I run my tools highr then 90psi what is a good amount of HP for an air compressor for my garage do u have ellectric power tools factoey what bands or artists make music with hand and power tools HUGE PROBLEM - My Chainset's threading is gone - cant remove!!!! Correct age to start using power tools. Consider the expression: S = 5500/0.2618D Modern grinding? New tools? Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: 4 guests |